Survivors of the Auckland supermarket terror attack seek a public hearing and answers to questions about what more could have been done to prevent the Islamic State supporter from changing their lives forever.

Ahamed Aathill Mohamed Samsudeen stabbed five shoppers in a frenzied knife attack before being shot dead by two undercover police officers at the New Lynn Countdown on September 3, 2021.

Today in Auckland, Coroner Marcus Elliott opened a scope hearing to explore what should be addressed in a coronial inquiry.

Lawyer Anna Adams, who is tasked with assisting the coroner, made submissions on behalf of the 12 survivors, comprising six women and six men who were aged between 29 and 77 at the time of the attack.

They variously suffered life-threatening stab wounds, were shoppers who attempted to stop him, and/or witnessed the attack and fatal shooting of the Sri Lankan national, who first came to New Zealand on a student visa in 2011 and was granted refugee status two years later.

Ahamed Aathill Mohamed Samsudeen was known to authorities as holding extremist ideologies. Photo / Greg Bowker

Adams said they have “fractured memories” of a chaotic and terrifying five minutes where Samusdeen, seeming “crazy” and saying “Allah Akbar”, carried out his attack, which appeared particularly directed at women.

Adams said the survivors support the coroner holding a public hearing to help answer “three key questions”.

The survivors wanted to know why the undercover tactical police tailing Samsudeen did not follow him into the supermarket and if he was being properly surveilled.

“Why were there two fully armed police officers sitting outside the supermarket in the carpark?” Adams asked, adding the survivors are especially concerned by a passage in the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) report that reads:

• New Lynn Terror Update: Attacker revealed, security services to review watchlist
• 'Isis-inspired lone wolf' shot dead after stabbing six innocent shoppers, man was 'known threat'
• 'Senselessly killed in a driveway': New Lynn shooting victim identified
• Person found in driveway near motel died despite police providing first aid

“In the weeks following Samsudeen’s release from prison, police received intelligence that Samsudeen wanted to commit an attack in a crowded place (like the Auckland CBD or a transport hub) with a vehicle and/or a knife, and had identified Friday as his preferred day for an attack. This information was passed on to the officers surveilling Samsudeen as part of their regular briefings and intelligence updates. Police briefed the officers that Samsudeen posed a high threat of a ‘low sophistication terrorist attack’ and that this could occur with little or no warning.”
The IPCA found police were justified in their response of shooting Samsudeen 12 times.

Adams said the survivors considered it “obvious” Samusdeen would target a supermarket or vaccination centre because those were the only crowded locations while Auckland was in level 4 Covid-19 lockdown at the time.

“The survivors also understand that Samsudeen was filmed on CCTV footage browsing knives for sale at the New Lynn Countdown in the month prior to the incident ... The survivors would like the coroner to consider whether, had the armed officers followed Samsudeen into the supermarket, they may have been able to prevent or reduce the harm that occurred.”

Emergency services rush a victim to an ambulance after the September 2021 attack. Photo / Alex Burton

The survivors also questioned if Samsudeen was being adequately supervised at the Auckland mosque he was staying at.

“Was the Glen Eden mosque sufficiently informed about the risk Samsudeen posed to the public, so that the mosque was able to recognise and communicate with the police or Corrections if the risk seemed to increase?” Adams said.

Thirdly, she told the hearing, the survivors “do not yet understand how Samsudeen was even in New Zealand” given his known support for terrorist ideologies and attempts to travel to Syria to join Isis.

“The survivors are however asking the inquiry to consider the earlier investigations and provide a finding as to why the incident was not prevented, as it could have been, by the earlier removal of Samsudeen from New Zealand from the time that his terrorist sympathies first came to the attention of the authorities in 2015.”

The Herald earlier revealed immigration officials had sought to revoke Samsudeen’s refugee status in 2018, however, he appealed and a final decision had yet to be made on whether he could be deported at the time of the attack.

Samsudeen in an image he posted to his social media accounts.

Adams said the victims did not want an inquiry to be politicised as a trial of New Zealand’s response to terrorist ideologies.

“And they do not wish to be retraumatised by the inquiry process itself,” she said.

“Most of the survivors do not wish to be called to give live testimony and be cross-examined about the incident, unless this is absolutely necessary,” she said, adding the survivors want the coroner to largely use the evidence already gathered, including the grainy and soundless CCTV footage of the attack.

Coroner Elliott said the attack had “profoundly affected” many people both physically and mentally.

He also acknowledged the loss and pain Samsudeen’s family have experienced and those who tried to help him and “were let down by his actions”.

Samsudeen had been released from prison in July 2021 after being convicted of two charges of possessing objectionable material relating to Isis, and one charge of failing to assist a police officer exercising a search power. He also faced further charges which were dismissed and was on bail at the time of the attack for assaulting two Corrections officers while in custody.

Before Samsudeen’s attack, the Herald revealed how Crown prosecutors had attempted to charge him under the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002, but a High Court judge ruled that preparing a terrorist attack was not in itself an offence under the legislation. The decision highlighted a longstanding gap in New Zealand’s counterterrorism laws.

Along with several judicial decisions, there have been five significant investigations after the attack, including the Co-ordinated Review of the Management of the Lynnmall Supermarket Attacker by the Inspector-General of SIS, IPCA chairman and Chief Inspector Office of the Inspectorate of the Department of Corrections.

Further to the IPCA report, a Corrections inspectorate report, a review of Immigration NZ files relating to Samsudeen conducted by Michael Heron KC and a police investigation report were completed.

The co-ordinated review found there was insufficient preparation and priority among Corrections, police and intelligence services to deradicalise Samsudeen.

Government ministers said they accepted the review’s findings, which referenced missed opportunities to provide rehabilitation, insufficient co-ordination between agencies, a reluctance to share information about the risk Samsudeen posed, and his placement in custody on remand for an “unacceptably long” period which “greatly exacerbated his risk of causing harm”.

Sam Hurley is the Herald’s news director and joined in 2017 after previously working for 1News and Hawke’s Bay Today. He led a multi-year Herald investigation into New Lynn terrorist Ahamed Samsudeen.