I can’t wait to get onto Auckland’s CRL. I can’t wait to check out the overly grand stations. And I can’t wait to experience moving around our city in a way residents of other modern cities around the world have been doing for decades. 

More so, I can’t wait to see if it does what it was intended to do - transform the city's rail network from a "one-way cul-de-sac" into a two-way through-system, designed to double the network's capacity and improve accessibility across the region.  

It’s been a monster of a ride getting this underground railway built, and yes it’s costs a bundle, but I was intrigued this week that those most vocal about the decision making and costs are the people responsible for the project. 

Good on former CRL boss Sean Sweeney for coming out and calling it how he sees it. We need people with experience expressing views on how we do things in this country. Sweeney oversaw the CRL, and its many cost increases and associated challenges for six years, and admits he would do things differently if he had his time again.

He feels the main issue with the CRL was that it was over-specified. It’s not just the CRL, he also thinks the Christchurch stadium could have been built for less. As much as Cantabrians are enjoying the stadium, I’m sure there are many who feel the same way.  

Building infrastructure is a bit like buying a house. When you buy you’re convinced you’re being ripped off and then 7-10 years later you’re generally pretty happy with the price and capital gain. I’m sure that over the next 10, 20, 100 years we’ll feel pretty pleased with ourselves for future proofing these investments: a platform long enough to cope with extra train carriages in anticipation of Auckland’s population growth, and a roof on Christchurch’s stadium. 

Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop took the opportunity to reinforce National’s ‘fiscally responsible’ stance by ordering a review into the build, while still trying to stay positive about a project which will open on his watch. It was a bit of a headline grab. An effort to look proactive in response to the criticism. But anything that costs $5.5 billion, and was as difficult and disruptive as the CRL has been, should be reviewed and learnt from. Preferably before we launch into a second Auckland Harbour crossing.

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown also piped up, expressing his long held view on the cost of the CRL, saying the project was “set up poorly” and he would take a tougher approach to projects.  

But weirdly, I don’t hear Aucklanders talking about it the same way as those who were or are involved in it.

Remember City Rail Link Limited was formed between the National Government and the Phil Goff-led Auckland Council in 2017 to jointly fund and oversee it through to completion. Both local and central Government are responsible for this project. 

While the CRL has been a torturous affair, especially for those living, working or trying to run a business around its construction, most locals just want it to open, for it to make a fundamental change to how we get around our clogged up city, and can’t wait to give it a try.

Spending $2 billion more on the CRL is worth a discussion, but maybe we need to keep it in perspective.

Superannuation currently costs the country over $24 billion annually and is estimated by Treasury to cost over $45 billion in 10 years. The reluctance of political parties to thoughtfully address this is neglectful. So, enjoy the fancy infrastructure where you can, there’s unlikely to be much more on the way. 

LISTEN ABOVE