ZB ZB
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Listen to NAME OF STATION
Up next
Listen live on
ZB

Police claim $2 million from laundering scheme by Malaysian national

Author
NZ Herald,
Publish Date
Thu, 3 Nov 2022, 1:26PM

Police claim $2 million from laundering scheme by Malaysian national

Author
NZ Herald,
Publish Date
Thu, 3 Nov 2022, 1:26PM

The High Court has granted the forfeiture of more than $2 million to police under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act following an investigation into money held in New Zealand by a Malaysian national.

An investigation found the funds were related to a fraudulent scheme in Malaysia called VenusFX. Asset recovery investigators here worked with counterparts in Malaysia.

Detective Inspector Craig Hamilton, manager asset recovery and money laundering, said the court’s judgment sent a strong message to overseas criminals considering New Zealand an option for money laundering.

Police restrained $2.2 million in April 2020 which had been “formerly held” in two bank accounts in the country.

The High Court determined on November 2 there were reasonable grounds to believe the money was the proceeds of crime and had been sent here for laundering purposes.

“The New Zealand anti-money-laundering system is designed to identify proceeds of crime, and when we do identify suspicious funds we act,” Hamilton said.

”Criminals around the world need to learn that New Zealand is not a safe place to send proceeds of illegal activity - if you send illicit funds here we will find them and confiscate them.”

A tip-off from Malaysian police investigating an alleged investment scam across Asia revealed nearly $1.9 million was transferred to New Zealand bank accounts and was frozen two years ago.

Shahidrawadey bin Shahidan was one of the founders of VenusFX in Malaysia, which purported to offer financial advice and investment opportunities, but a police investigation in 2016 concluded the foreign exchange company made false and dishonest claims.

The Auckland man was not charged or convicted of any crime but instead placed under a two-year supervision order, which included electronic monitoring at night and regular reporting to a police station.

Assets worth nearly $1.1m were also forfeited under Malaysian anti-money laundering laws, including $817,000 in a bank account, on the basis they were profits of fraud by VenusFX.

Then two years later in June 2019, Malaysian police contacted their counterparts in New Zealand about other funds shifted to bank accounts here.

They believed the money was the proceeds of the alleged VenusFX fraud, and detectives from the Asset Recovery Unit identified deposits of more than $2.2m into two Bank of New Zealand accounts over a seven-month period in 2016.

The New Zealand police made an application to the High Court to freeze the balance of the funds, nearly $1.9m in bank accounts controlled by Shahidan, under the Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act.

The law is designed to seize profits from alleged criminal offending.

In a court hearing in February 2021, the police alleged Shahidan - who represented himself - unlawfully benefited from “significant criminal activity” by laundering the proceeds of the fraudulent VenusFX foreign exchange trading scheme into the two bank accounts.

He opposed the restraining order, denied being involved in significant criminal activity and argued the funds were not “tainted” in terms of the criminal proceeds law.

Shahidan claimed to have a minor role in VenusFX as a programmer doing technical work on the “back end of the system”, and having nothing to do with financial matters.

This was at odds with a statement he gave to the Royal Malaysian Police in which Shahidan admitted being a founder of VenusFX along with several friends.

Several YouTube videos of VenusFX events were played to the court, in which Shahidan was shown giving speeches to promote the scheme.

“The relevant videos strongly support the inference that Mr Shahidan was a much more central figure in VenusFX than he was willing to admit,” wrote Justice Sarah Katz in her judgment released in June.

Shahidan was also the sole director and shareholder of Venus Financial Markets Limited, which the police allege was the corporate entity underpinning VenusFX, which he set up in New Zealand in 2015.

Two days before establishing that business, Shahidan registered a second company in New Zealand called Igateway Limited. He was the sole shareholder and director.

The police allege that Igateway traded as “IZZIPAY”, a payment processing website listed as a “partner” of VenusFX on its website.

Shahidan disputed this, although Justice Katz said the police claim was supported by contemporaneous documents.

More than $2.2m was deposited into the Igateway bank accounts between February and September 2016.

The timing of the deposits to Igateway coincides with the period in which VenusFX is believed to have operated, said Justice Katz.

When the Bank of New Zealand put a “stop” on the Igateway accounts in May 2016, Shahidan told the bank the deposits were payments to his software business - not VenusFX.

Under cross-examination in the High Court in 2021, Shahidan was asked to explain why, in a July 2016 Facebook post in the name of VenusFX, investors were told to put funds into an Igateway account.

Shahidan said the Facebook page was not VenusFX’s page and the instruction for investors to deposit funds into a bank account, of which he was the sole signatory, was posted by another person, for unknown reasons.

These explanations were “entirely implausible”, said Justice Katz.

“Further, it seems inherently improbable that Mr Shahidan, apparently working on his own, would have been able to generate revenue of over $2m for software programming services over a seven-month period when he was also working full-time as the chief operating officer for VenusFX,” the High Court judge wrote.

Justice Katz ruled there were “reasonable grounds” to believe money laundering had occurred and Shahidan had benefited from the alleged crime, and granted the interim restraining orders.

Frozen assets are held by the Official Assignee, a government body that administers bankruptcies until the High Court rules on whether they should be permanently forfeited to the Crown. The process takes two years, on average, but the most complex cases can take longer.

 

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you