Keep up with
Newstalk ZB

Fri, 24 May 2013, 18:23

Have Your Say

Talkback 0800 80 10 80
Overseas +64 9 307 1080
Text 9292

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS
  • Sign Up

Site Search

Search Search

Select your region:

Mike's Editorial: Memo to Judith

Share |

By: Mike Hosking | Wednesday, April 04, 2012

Memo to Judith Collins: Don’t do it. Don’t sue them for defamation. As aggrieved as you may feel right now, as justified as you may feel your case is, as home free as your lawyer may paint your case, in the long run it simply won’t be worth it.

Litigation, and I speak from some experience, is expensive and perhaps worse, it’s time consuming. If it were a quick fix, if it was like a game of sport, a start, a stop, a result, then I’d say go for it. But litigation over defamation can take years.

I admired Chris Cairns the other day because it was about reputation and his ability to work. In Collins’ case it isn’t.

Certainly it’s about reputation, but her role as a Cabinet Minister is hardly in trouble. Her electability is hardly a problem. So it’s her name she’s looking to defend and that is very much an individual thing.

She may prize it so highly. All costs and timeframe in court action go out the window in looking to defend it. But if it’s to be able to stand in a couple of years time on the steps of Parliament and say “see, I told you”, that Mallard and Little were wrong and that Radio New Zealand were wrong to broadcast it, then I am just not sure there will be that many people queuing up to say ‘bravo, well done.”

The counter argument, and it’s one I actually have a lot of sympathy for despite what I’ve just said, is that if people don’t take a stand, if they don’t hold others to account then things get sloppy, things get loose, people felt that if they got away with that then they’ll give it another go. That in itself sets a precedent. You start to work in an environment where you can pretty much say anything you like. Knowing the odds of someone calling you on it are slim.

The value in Collins taking action and potentially winning is that not only does she get the victory, she sets the precedent. In law it’s often the precedent that has the vastly wider value. She gets the win, but we all get the rules and understanding as to what’s right and what’s not on.

Further, she is to be commended if she does go ahead on footing the bill herself. As right as may have been as a minister to seek the Crown’s assistance, she would’ve been on a hiding to nowhere with the public.

So the potential is she foots the bill, she takes the plunge, she wins. If all of that comes to pass, it would be the most noble of victories. There must always be merit in such a course, but it’s a brave soul who charts that course.

Should Judith Collins sue? Leave a comment below...

Highlights from The Mike Hosking Breakfast

Mike's Editorial: Council's living wage ...

Friday, May 24, 2013

Is it surprising that the Hamilton City Council is the first in the country ...

Mike's Editorial: Urewera raids over the ...

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Can it be a surprise to anyone that Sir David Carruthers has found the poli ...

Mike's Editorial: NZ a better prospect t ...

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

The numbers don’t appear to lie or in this case even mislead - there ...

Mike's Editorial: Teaching profession st ...

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Well praise the Lord, do we see some common sense at last in the teachers&r ...

Mike's Editorial: Breakfast in schools m ...

Monday, May 20, 2013

There is allegedly an announcement coming on feeding kids in schools. Curr ...

Mike's Editorial: Budget reflections

Friday, May 17, 2013

I know it's as dry as dust and none of us apart from the odd numbers nerd o ...

Advertisement
  • Amanda Bynes arrested in Manhattan

  • Immigration scam leads to community sentence

  • Super Rugby: NZ leaders prepare to do battle

  • Owner of vehicle in Wellington crash located

America's Cup
Advertisement